Phoenix

DesertExile: July 2006

29 July 2006

Bravery, Bonding, and Dis'ers






The photo is of an Israeli Defense Force unit after a battle. You see weariness on the soldier's face. In the background, from experience, the other soldiers are both comparing experiences, and congratulating themselves and each other for getting through the engagement.

General George S. Patton said:
"Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best; it removes all that is base. All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood"

I will wager all of these men chose honor and duty over fear.

Now, let us go back for a period of 42-35 years. American Democratic Politicians committed our soldiers to a long fight in Vietnam. From the then Secretary of Defense Robert STRANGE McNamara, in 2001, came a statement that HE KNEW that the U S COULD NOT WIN that war. QUESTION: Why did he keep sending men to their deaths, disability, and permanent pstchological scars. The Only answer I can think of--is the usual DDemocrat motivation: "It looks good, it shows that WE care!"

So, you have similar scene from 1964 to 1973 all over South Vietnam.

Do the Democrat Politicians praise and thank those soldiers?

HELL-NO!

That simpering, cowardly, guilt-ridden bunch of A-holes condemned those troops, compared them to barbarian conquerors, and labeled them "Baby Killers".

It is one exhilarating feeling to come through a battle, alive and more or less victorious. But let someone start ripping you for what you did, did not do, or criticize how you were still alive, and you will hate the person's -- or persons' guts forever!

Someone who lost a presidential election can tell you--It makes a difference!

27 July 2006

Soldier's statement



The following are the lucid words of Captain Uri Lavie, a company commander of the Golani Brigade, which is fighting Hizballah terrorists along Israeli's northern border.
May his words constitute the Pillar of Fire for Israel's leaders, and for western democracies, in their Third World War against Islamic terrorism.

(Yoram Ettinger)

Captain Uri Lavie, a company commander in the Golani Brigade briefing his soldiers “ nine months into their military service “ a few minutes before joining the battle against Hizballah terrorists in southern Lebanon ("Ha'aretz, July 27, 2006):

"This is our time to rise to the challenge, put on the helmets and the bullet proof vests and make sure that the northern border is secure.

We shall fulfill any mission in a most effective manner, in face of any challenge.

If we shall not fulfill our mission we shall forfeit the right to exist.

We shall not lose this war, which we did not start.

Our duty is to serve as a defense force of the Jewish People, and to secure the peace of mind of the civilians in northern Israel.

If we shall not do it, no one will do it in our place.

For two thousand years we waited for the establishment of the Jewish State, and we are not going to roll back because a bunch of terrorists assume that they can scare us.

He who cannot defend Liberty does not deserve Liberty.

If we will not be able to fight until our last drop of blood, in order to secure the Liberty of our People on its own soil, our People will not enjoy Liberty.

There is time to talk and there is time to act. At this time, when missiles and Katyushas afflict the North all the way to Haifa, in addition to the two kidnapped soldiers, the ten soldiers killed and the dozens injured, it is time to fight and not to talk. We are the force, which has been chosen to fight, and we shall perform in the most effective manner.

I will be the first one to enter the battle and the last one to come out, and will do everything in my power to get you out alive and well. On Friday, with G-D's help, we will rejoin with our families. However, I cannot do it alone. Once we cross the northern border, you should exercise full alert and full responsibility toward your fellow soldier."



Men who have faced deadly force, and came through have a self-confidence that no drug or counseling can substitute for. These men know each other, although they may be from different forces, countries or religions.

This poem says it all:
by Father Charles R. Fink
Thanks to Tom Schuckman!!!

This Page Posted In Memory of Carl Gray Jr., 1949-2003


BURY ME WITH SOLDIERS

I've played a lot of roles in life;
I've met a lot of men,
I've done a lot of things I'd like to think
I wouldn't do again.

And though I'm young, I'm old enough
To know someday I'll die.
And to think about what lies beyond,
Beside whom I would lie.

Perhaps it doesn't matter much;
Still if I had my choice,
I'd want a grave amongst Soldiers when
At last death quells my voice.

I'm sick of the hypocrisy
Of lectures of the wise.
I'll take the man, with all the flaws,
Who goes, though scared, and dies.

The troops I knew were commonplace
They didn't want the war;
They fought because their fathers as
Their fathers had before.

They cursed and killed and wept...
God knows they're easy to deride...
But bury me with men like these;
They faced the guns and died.

It's funny when you think of it,
The way we got along.
We'd come from different worlds
To live in one where no one belongs,

I didn't even like them all;
I'm sure they'd all agree.
Yet I would give my life for them,
I know some did for me..

So bury me with soldiers, please,
Though much maligned they be.
Yes, bury me with soldiers, for
I miss their company.

-- Father Charles R. Fink
On Memorial Day, 2003

26 July 2006

Glendale (AZ) officer fired over paperwork problems

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0726firedcop0726.html

Brent Whiting
The Arizona Republic
Jul. 26, 2006 12:00 AM

A Glendale police officer with a history of disciplinary and paperwork problems dating back to 1995 has been fired by Steve Conrad, the city's police chief.

It's the latest action in a string of paperwork scandals that have rocked the Glendale Police Department since last year.

Officer John Contreras, a 12½-year member of the Glendale force, received a written notice of termination from Conrad, who said Contreras has a long history of failing to complete investigation reports.

Included are 60 fraudulent reports that falsely claimed investigations had been completed, Conrad said.

"Your conduct is unbecoming of a City of Glendale employee and a violation of the public trust placed in you," Conrad wrote.

Contreras has appealed the dismissal, setting the stage for an Aug. 16 hearing before the city's personnel board in which he will attempt to win back his job.

Contreras could not be reached for comment on the dismissal, issued June 8. City records show that on eight previous occasions since 1995, he had been written up or reprimanded for job deficiencies, including paperwork issues.

Conrad said that in some of the cases, there was "re-victimization" of crime victims whose cases were never heard because of inaction by Contreras.

In at least 10 cases, there were "further altercations" between the listed crime victim and the suspect, Conrad said.

"Two of these reports were felony aggravated assaults and one of these reports involved a 5-year-old victim of child abuse," Conrad said.

Investigators were able to complete the work in some of the neglected cases, but in others no further action was possible because the statute of limitations had expired, he said.

There have been four other reported incidents of paperwork problems involving Glendale police since 2005.

On April 11, 2005, Brad Moore, a Glendale detective, was fired for work involving 242 domestic-violence cases.

Officials said Moore filed reports falsely claiming work had been done, but 158 cases had to be scrapped because the one-year statute of limitations had expired.

After the Moore scandal, problems surfaced involving two other Glendale detectives who kept their jobs.

One of them, Jeff Horsley, was accused of failing to do a proper investigation in 59 sexual-assault cases and destroying 30 videotapes in some of the cases. The other, Kristian Grube, was accused of failing to do work on at least 174 domestic-violence cases.

The most recent incident came earlier this year. On April 19, Officer Scott Blake, a 10-year veteran, was slapped with an 80-hour suspension without pay for ignoring deadlines to complete daily crime reports.

Conrad went to work on the paperwork problem after taking command Dec. 28, replacing Andrew Kirkland, who had resigned amid allegations of impropriety.

Conrad has since issued orders imposing new policies on the filing of reports.

Now, officers must complete all reports upon the completion of a shift and before going home, Conrad said.

Previously, Glendale officers were required to file reports for "critical" cases, such as felony arrests, domestic violence and stolen vehicles, by the end of a shift.

Wonder why he was there this long? Could it be Affirmative Action?

My guess is that this man's inaction stood to cost the Police Department more from citizen lawsuits than his lawsuit for being terminated for Prejudice or discrimination
.

25 July 2006

Israel's end of patience


Canadian parliamentary assistants gather at UN post (top) as UN and Hezbollah flags are seen at a UN post (above).


http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1153291986779&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
President Moshe Katsav criticized the international community for turning a blind eye to the incompletion of UN Security Council's Resolution 1559, Monday, at a visit to town-under-fire, Kiryat Shmona. Katsav recognized world leaders' support for Israel's reaction to Hizbullah's latest terror.

Katsav suggested that leaders had perhaps made decisions in the past that were poorly thought out, pinpointing Israel's last pullout from Lebanon and the strengthening of Hamas terror over the last few years. He gently added that "sometimes it is better to act with poor judgment, rather than act with no judgment at all."

http://www.mideastweb.org/1559.htm
Resolution 1559 was an attempt to discourage Syrian meddling in Lebanon. Syrian troops had been in Lebanon since the spring of 1976, putting an end to the Lebanese civil war and making a semblance of order in Lebanon under the Taif accord, but at the same time presiding over brutalities such as the 1976 massacre of over 2,000 Palestinians in the Tel Al-Zaatar refugee camp. Syria dictates Lebanese foreign policy and provides support as well as control of the Hizbullah terrorist group and militia.

Since 1990, the Lebanese constitution has been amended for every presidential election: once in 1995, allowing then President Elias Hrawi an extra three years, and again in 1998 - allowing Lahoud, who was army commander at the time and thus ineligible, to seek the post.

In the summer of 2004, the Syrians initiated a move to amend the Lebanese constitution so that their favored candidate, Emile Lahoud, could continue to be president. The United States and other countries objected to continued Syrian interference in Lebanese affairs, and the United Nations Security Council passed resolution 1559 calling for non-interference in Lebanese affairs, for disarming of militias and for Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon in accordance with previous UN resolutions.

The resolution was adopted by a vote of 9 in favour (Angola, Benin, Chile, France, Germany, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom, United States) to none against, with 6 abstentions (Algeria, Brazil, China, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation)

A Lebanese representative made the following remarkable statement, quoted in the UN Press Release: >

MOHAMAD ISSA, Secretary-General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants of Lebanon, said that there were no militias in Lebanon. There was only the national Lebanese resistance, which appeared after the Israeli occupation and which would remain so long as Israel remained. The resistance force existed alongside the Lebanese national forces. Lebanon determined the presence and size of the force, depending on the country’s need. The authority of Lebanon extended to all parts of Lebanon except those areas occupied by Israel.

He said that submitting the draft resolution confused two matters. The first was the distinguished relations linking Lebanon and Syria, which achieved their joint interests, particularly the interests of Lebanon. Friendly Syria had helped Lebanon to maintain stability and security within its borders. It had warded off radicalism and violence, fed by the violence exercised by Israel against the Palestinians. Secondly, the matter was purely internal, and related to the presidential elections to be held in Lebanon. Syrian troops came to Lebanon in accordance with legitimate requests. Their presence was guarded by an agreement concluded by two sovereign States. Those troops had been redeployed several times. They contributed to rebuffing the radical reactions emanating from repulsive Israeli actions.

Hence, saying that Syria supported radical movements in Lebanon was not true. To the contrary, Syria supported the Lebanese national resistance, which desired to liberate the territories occupied by Israel. The draft resolution was talking about supporting free and just elections in Lebanon. He did not believe that that internal matter had ever been discussed in the Council relating to any Member State. It was an internal matter, he stressed. The United Nations had not interfered in that matter with regard to any other State. There was no justification for the draft resolution, which constituted an interference in the internal affairs of a Member State.

In addition, it discussed bilateral relations between two friendly nations, neither of which had filed any complaint concerning those relations. He called for the withdrawal of the draft resolution.

The Lebanese parliament ignored the resolution and voted for the constitutional amendment, amid widespread reports of arm-twisting and Syrian threats. Beirut MP Nabil de Freige stated, "Of the 96 people who voted for the amendment, I can guarantee not even seven are really for it." Four ministers resigned to protest the passage of the amendment. One of whom, former Economy Minister Marwan Hamadeh, was wounded in an assassination attempt on October 1.

Subsequently, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan warned that Syria was not complying with the resolution. BUT, THE UN DID NOTHING!Lebanese and Syrian spokesmen declared their defiance of the resolution, but Syria shifted a small number of troops (estimated at 300 to 3000) out of Lebanon and moved troops away from Beirut to the Beka region near the Syrian-Lebanese border. Following the assassination of popular Lebanese politician Rafiq Hariri in February of 2005, widely attributed to Syria, pressure grew on Syria to withdraw from Lebanon, and Syria withdrew its troops, but not its intelligence agents.

A key provision of Resolution 1559 was disarmament of militias:

3. Calls for the disbanding and disarmament of all Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias;

4. Supports the extension of the control of the Government of Lebanon over all Lebanese territory;

Provisions for disarming of militias were not implemented. The Hezbollah, puppets of Iran and Syria, remained under arms and prevented independent action by the Lebanese government. Hezbollah representatives were taken into the Lebanese government of Fouad Seniora. In 2006, Hezbolla renewed attacks on Israel, resulting in a major confrontation. Resolutions of the UN Security Council have the validity of international law.
Ami Isseroff

FACTS:
Israel complied with UN Resolution 1559..and withdrew from Lebanon.
Hezb'allah moved in, stocked up on weapons, and started killing more jews, as Rule#1 for Islamo-Fascits (see photo of Rally) is KILL INFIDELS .
INFIDEL=anyone who isn't the right flavor of "The followers of Allah".

The UN DID NOTHING. No enforcement. Complicit conspiracy with Heb'allah to KILL MORE JEWS.

If you look at the UN Council on Human Rights:

AFRICAN STATES LATIN AMERICAN & CARIBBEAN STATES

Algeria 2007 MUSLIM
Cameroon
Djibouti 2009 MUSLIM
Gabon 2008
Ghana 2008
Mali 2008
Mauritius 2009
Morocco 2007 MUSLIM
Nigeria 2009
Senegal 2009
South Africa 2007 ANTI-SEMITIC
Tunisia 2007 MUSLIM
Zambia 2008
Argentina 2007
Brazil 2008
Cuba 2009 SOCIALISTIC anti-religious dictatorship
Ecuador 2007
Guatemala 2008
Mexico 2009
Peru 2008
Uruguay 2009

ASIAN STATES WESTERN EUROPE & OTHER STATES

Bahrain 2007 MUSLIM
Bangladesh 2009 MUSLIM
China 2009 Anti-religion
India 2007
Indonesia 2007 MUSLIM
Japan 2008
Jordan 2009 MUSLIM
Malaysia 2009 MUSLIM
Pakistan 2008 MUSLIM
Philippines 2007
Republic of Korea 2008
Saudi Arabia 2009 MUSLIM
Sri Lanka 2008 Canada 2009
Finland 2007
France 2008 ANTI-SEMITIC
Germany 2009 ANTI-SEMITIC, renewed Nazi trend.
Netherlands 2007 OCCUPIED by MUSLIMS
Switzerland 2009
United Kingdom 2008 SIGNIFICANT MUSLIM POPULATION
EASTERN EUROPEAN STATES

Azerbaijan 2009 MUSLIM
Czech Republic 2007
Poland 2007
Romania 2008
Russian Federation 2009
Ukraine 2008

You will NOT see Israel.

An idiot can deduce that the Islamo-Fascists routinely ignore UN resolutions and International Law. The ONLY thing they understand is OVERWHELMING, BRUTE force!

I saw a post to an Israeli news site from some bimbo in Canada. The author was decrying Israel's entering and bombing Lebanon.
My retort was," To Canadians, it is a TV show. To Israel, it is survival."

24 July 2006

Retaliation becomes a way of life

By Mason Stockstill, Staff Writer
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

CHINO - It's not just the violent felons who make it dangerous to work at the California Institution for Men.
According to numerous employees of the prison -- correctional officers and other staff members -- co-workers and supervisors can also be a threat to safety and sanity.
Special Section:
Criminal Neglect
(Read Part I and Part II, view videos and photo galleries, links to resources)
At the prison, retaliation is a common response to complaints about unfair treatment. Hence, employees often avoid speaking out because they fear retribution.
"These people take it personally, especially when you expose them," said Gary Clark, an officer at CIM. "I can't think of any other reason why they would single me out."
Clark said he believes he was retaliated against last year for challenging a decision that kept him from working a light-duty assignment following an injury.
Clark's doctor had restricted him from working more than eight hours a day. CIM officials concluded he couldn't perform the duties of a correctional officer, which include the possibility of mandatory overtime, so he was sent home.
When he fought the decision, Clark was asked to take a "fit for duty" examination, which is often a precursor to forcing an employee to retire for medical reasons, he said.
"I've been there 21 years, and I've never seen them actually do a fit for duty on anyone," said Clark, who also believes his involvement with the officers' union made him a target for retaliation. "It was more of a threat."
Several other employees at CIM described in interviews and lawsuits that they faced retaliation from co-workers or supervisors in recent years. Among them:
• Karen Gossom, an employee in the prison's laundry operations, said officers threatened her after she filed a sexual harassment claim in 2004 against her supervisor, who she said assaulted her. "One officer told me he wouldn't help me if the inmates decided to assault me," said Gossom, who has since settled her lawsuit against the department.
• Three nurses in the prison's hospital said after they complained in 2004 about another nurse who improperly brought medical equipment into the staff lounge, they were given heavier patient loads and ostracized by their colleagues.
• Psychiatrist Kenneth Levin filed a lawsuit last year alleging he faced retaliatory discipline after successfully challenging a demotion at the prison.
• One officer who spoke on condition of anonymity said he faced a personnel investigation after he accused a supervisor of dishonesty two years ago. The officer refused to speak about the case, fearing that to do so could endanger him or his family. "These people are just crooks, and they're capable of anything," he said.
Such behavior is not new. In 1990, three officers were fired after CIM managers tape-recorded their phone conversations. The officers sued, alleging the eavesdropping was payback for their union activities.
Retaliation by supervisors can lead to a breakdown in trust in the workplace, said Joni Johnston, CEO of WorkRelationships, an employee relations consulting firm.
"Management behavior is always going to trump policies or procedures," she said. "If managers are subtly encouraging or allowing employees to bully, intimidate, threaten ... people are much more likely to say, ‘I don't care what's written down, I know what I see every day.' "
Warden Mike Poulos said some claims by officers fearing retaliation --specifically those who refused to use their names in interviews with reporters -- don't hold water.
In his 28 years with the department, Poulos said he'd never seen an officer retaliated against for speaking to the media.
But employees who fear payback are evident throughout California's prison system.
From 2002 to 2004, the most recent year for which data is available, the State Personnel Board received 146 complaints of retaliation against whistle-blowers in state agencies. Of those, 40 came from the Department of Corrections -- far more than any other department. Caltrans was second, with 16.
Inside the department, the phenomenon has a name: the code of silence. Officers who break the code by speaking out about wrongdoing can face repercussions, say many who work inside prison walls.
Though some union officials and others deny that any such code exists among officers, former department head Roderick Hickman believed in it enough to issue memos and public statements reminding employees of their obligation to report misconduct.
"The public's trust in this department is ... violated by retaliating against, ostracizing or in any way undermining those employees who report wrongdoing and/or cooperate during investigations," said Hickman and Richard Rimmer, former director of the Department of Corrections, in a 2004 memo.
That memo, sent to all corrections employees, went out just weeks after Officer Donald Vodicka testified at a Senate committee hearing about allegations that officers covered up co-workers' misconduct. Vodicka feared payback so strongly that he wore a bulletproof vest to the hearing.
CIM Officer Robert Spejcher faced a similar situation earlier this year, when he testified against Shayne Allyn Ziska, a former correctional officer. Ziska was eventually found guilty of federal racketeering charges stemming from his association with a prison gang called the Nazi Low Riders and was sentenced to 17 years in federal prison.
Spejcher provided key testimony against Ziska, telling the judge that he let white inmates out of their cells and left doors unlocked so prisoners could freely move about the facility.
In court, Spejcher said he feared for his safety and the safety of his family as a result of his testimony.
Why? "Because I still work in California Institution for Men, and Officer Ziska still has friends in the institution," he said.

Retaliation becomes a way of life (Correctional Staff)

http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_4086390

By Mason Stockstill, Staff Writer
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

CHINO - It's not just the violent felons who make it dangerous to work at the California Institution for Men.
According to numerous employees of the prison -- correctional officers and other staff members -- co-workers and supervisors can also be a threat to safety and sanity.
Special Section:
Criminal Neglect

http://www.dailybulletin.com/criminalneglect

(Read Part I and Part II, view videos and photo galleries, links to resources)
At the prison, retaliation is a common response to complaints about unfair treatment. Hence, employees often avoid speaking out because they fear retribution.
"These people take it personally, especially when you expose them," said Gary Clark, an officer at CIM. "I can't think of any other reason why they would single me out."
Clark said he believes he was retaliated against last year for challenging a decision that kept him from working a light-duty assignment following an injury.
Clark's doctor had restricted him from working more than eight hours a day. CIM officials concluded he couldn't perform the duties of a correctional officer, which include the possibility of mandatory overtime, so he was sent home.
When he fought the decision, Clark was asked to take a "fit for duty" examination, which is often a precursor to forcing an employee to retire for medical reasons, he said.
"I've been there 21 years, and I've never seen them actually do a fit for duty on anyone," said Clark, who also believes his involvement with the officers' union made him a target for retaliation. "It was more of a threat."
Several other employees at CIM described in interviews and lawsuits that they faced retaliation from co-workers or supervisors in recent years. Among them:
• Karen Gossom, an employee in the prison's laundry operations, said officers threatened her after she filed a sexual harassment claim in 2004 against her supervisor, who she said assaulted her. "One officer told me he wouldn't help me if the inmates decided to assault me," said Gossom, who has since settled her lawsuit against the department.
• Three nurses in the prison's hospital said after they complained in 2004 about another nurse who improperly brought medical equipment into the staff lounge, they were given heavier patient loads and ostracized by their colleagues.
• Psychiatrist Kenneth Levin filed a lawsuit last year alleging he faced retaliatory discipline after successfully challenging a demotion at the prison.
• One officer who spoke on condition of anonymity said he faced a personnel investigation after he accused a supervisor of dishonesty two years ago. The officer refused to speak about the case, fearing that to do so could endanger him or his family. "These people are just crooks, and they're capable of anything," he said.
Such behavior is not new. In 1990, three officers were fired after CIM managers tape-recorded their phone conversations. The officers sued, alleging the eavesdropping was payback for their union activities.
Retaliation by supervisors can lead to a breakdown in trust in the workplace, said Joni Johnston, CEO of WorkRelationships, an employee relations consulting firm.
"Management behavior is always going to trump policies or procedures," she said. "If managers are subtly encouraging or allowing employees to bully, intimidate, threaten ... people are much more likely to say, ‘I don't care what's written down, I know what I see every day.' "
Warden Mike Poulos said some claims by officers fearing retaliation --specifically those who refused to use their names in interviews with reporters -- don't hold water.
In his 28 years with the department, Poulos said he'd never seen an officer retaliated against for speaking to the media.
But employees who fear payback are evident throughout California's prison system.
From 2002 to 2004, the most recent year for which data is available, the State Personnel Board received 146 complaints of retaliation against whistle-blowers in state agencies. Of those, 40 came from the Department of Corrections -- far more than any other department. Caltrans was second, with 16.
Inside the department, the phenomenon has a name: the code of silence. Officers who break the code by speaking out about wrongdoing can face repercussions, say many who work inside prison walls.
Though some union officials and others deny that any such code exists among officers, former department head Roderick Hickman believed in it enough to issue memos and public statements reminding employees of their obligation to report misconduct.
"The public's trust in this department is ... violated by retaliating against, ostracizing or in any way undermining those employees who report wrongdoing and/or cooperate during investigations," said Hickman and Richard Rimmer, former director of the Department of Corrections, in a 2004 memo.
That memo, sent to all corrections employees, went out just weeks after Officer Donald Vodicka testified at a Senate committee hearing about allegations that officers covered up co-workers' misconduct. Vodicka feared payback so strongly that he wore a bulletproof vest to the hearing.
CIM Officer Robert Spejcher faced a similar situation earlier this year, when he testified against Shayne Allyn Ziska, a former correctional officer. Ziska was eventually found guilty of federal racketeering charges stemming from his association with a prison gang called the Nazi Low Riders and was sentenced to 17 years in federal prison.
Spejcher provided key testimony against Ziska, telling the judge that he let white inmates out of their cells and left doors unlocked so prisoners could freely move about the facility.
In court, Spejcher said he feared for his safety and the safety of his family as a result of his testimony.
Why? "Because I still work in California Institution for Men, and Officer Ziska still has friends in the institution," he said.

An Israeli's letter to the Wotld



Image--King David--after engaging Goliath

This was posted on Free Republic.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1670818/posts

For a long time, my intent was to post something like this, but it always ran into about six to ten pages. This summation is very good.

God Bless Israel!





AN OPEN LETTER TO THE WORLD

An Israeli's reply to the world (UN) can be summed up in two words and they aren't Happy Birthday.

Dear World,

I understand that you are upset by us, here in Israel.

Indeed, it appears that you are quite upset, even angry. (Outraged?)

Indeed, every few years you seem to become upset by us. Today, it is the "brutal repression of the Palestinians"; yesterday it was Lebanon; before that it was the bombing of the nuclear reactor in Baghdad and the Yom Kippur War and the Sinai campaign. It appears that Jews who triumph and who, therefore, live, upset you most extraordinarily.

Of course, dear world, long before there was an Israel, we - the Jewish people - upset you.

We upset a German people who elected Hitler and upset an Austrian people who cheered his entry into Vienna and we upset a whole slew of Slavic nations - Poles, Slovaks, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Russians, Hungarians and Romanians. And we go back a long, long way in the history of world upset.

We upset the Cossacks of Chmielnicki who massacred tens of thousands of us in 1648-49; we upset the Crusaders who, on their way to liberate the Holy Land, were so upset at Jews that they slaughtered untold numbers of us.

For centuries, we upset a Roman Catholic Church that did its best to define our relationship through inquisitions, and we upset the arch-enemy of the church, Martin Luther, who, in his call to burn the synagogues and the Jews within them, showed an admirable Christian ecumenical spirit.

And it is because we became so upset over upsetting you, dear world, that we decided to leave you - in a manner of speaking - and establish a Jewish state. The reasoning was that living in close contact with you, as resident-strangers in the various countries that comprise you, we upset you, irritate you and disturb you. What better notion, then, than to leave you (and thus love you)- and have you love us and so, we decided to come home - home to the same land we were driven out 1,900 years earlier by a Roman world that, apparently, we also upset.

Alas, dear world, it appears that you are hard to please.

Having left you and your pogroms and inquisitions and crusades and holocausts, having taken our leave of the general world to live alone in our own little state, we continue to upset you. You are upset that we repress the poor Palestinians. You are deeply angered over the fact that we do not give up the lands of 1967, which are clearly the obstacle to peace in the Middle East

Moscow is upset and Washington is upset. The "radical" Arabs are upset and the gentle Egyptian moderates are upset.

Well, dear world, consider the reaction of a normal Jew from Israel.

In 1920 and 1921 and 1929, there were no territories of 1967 to impede peace between Jews and Arabs. Indeed, there was no Jewish State to upset anybody Nevertheless, the same oppressed and repressed Palestinians slaughtered tens of Jews in Jerusalem, Jaffa, Safed and Hebron. Indeed, 67 Jews were slaughtered one day in Hebron in 1929.

Dear world, why did the Arabs - the Palestinians - massacre 67 Jews in one day in 1929? Could it have been their anger over Israeli aggression in 1967? And why were 510 Jewish men, women and children slaughtered in Arab riots between 1936-39? Was it because Arabs were upset over 1967?

And when you, dear world, proposed a UN Partition Plan in 1947 that would have created a "Palestinian State" alongside a tiny Israel and the Arabs cried "no" and went to war and killed 6,000 Jews - was that "upset" caused by the aggression of 1967? And, by the way, dear world, why did we not hear your cry of "upset" then?

The poor Palestinians who today kill Jews with explosives and firebombs and stones are part of the same people who ? when they had all the territories they now demand be given to them for their state -attempted to drive the Jewish state into the sea. The same twisted faces, the same hate, the same cry of "itbach-al-yahud" (Massacre the Jew!) that we hear and see today, were seen and heard then. The same people, the same dream - destroy Israel. What they failed to do yesterday, they dream of today, but we should not "repress" them.

Dear world, you stood by during the holocaust and you stood by in 1948 as seven states launched a war that the Arab League proudly compared to the Mongol massacres.

You stood by in 1967 as Nasser, wildly cheered by wild mobs in every Arab capital in the world, vowed to drive the Jews into the sea. And you would stand by tomorrow if Israel were facing extinction.

And since we know that the Arabs-Palestinians dream daily of that extinction, we will do everything possible to remain alive in our own land. If that bothers you, dear world, well ? think of how many times in the past you bothered us.

In any event, dear world, if you are bothered by us, here is one Jew in Israel who could not care less and, frankly doesn't give a damn....

22 July 2006

Stranger, go tell the Spartans that here we are buried, obedient to their orders



In the year 480 Before Christ, King Leonidas took 300 troops and went to a choke point. He knew that the Persians (Modern Day Iranians) were set to invade, pillage, and kill Greece.

The Persian King, Xerxes, had anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 troops, depending on who is telling the story.

Leonidas could have: Retreated, attempted to negotiate, or surrendered and hoped for the best.

Modern day "Diplomats" would have taken one or all of those options.

Leonidas kicked ass for three days.

http://library.flawlesslogic.com/spartan.htm

In the morning, after a short meeting of the war council, it was decided that Thermopylae was an undefendable outpost. Leonidas and his army of 7,000 were ordered back south to Athens before they were encircled and it became too late to leave; but, although it was even acceptable in the martial Spartan tradition to abandon a post that was undefendable, he refused. He ordered all of the allied forces under his command back south to Athens; he had decided this is where he and his Spartans would die. The allied forces complied, and all that was left was the obedient 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians who said they would fight to the end, and 400 Thebans. That night, it is recorded that Leonidas toasted to all of his troops during their last meal: "Tonight, we shall Sup with Pluto!" In other words, "this is our last meal before we feast with the Dead!"
As the first light from Sol Invictus began to shine down upon the fatigued Hellenic forces, Leonidas and his men prepared for war. With the pan-Hellenic forces of 7,000, Leonidas had stood on the defensive; however, his only desire now was to make as great a slaughter as possible, so as to inspire the enemy with dread of the Greek name.
Without fear, and without waiting to be attacked, he and his small force of 1,400 went on the offensive. The 300 Spartans butchered Persians by the droves; Thespians fought with vigor; the Thebans fought for their lives. Leonidas was one of the first to be cut down, and the battle for his corpse would leave two Persian princes, Xerxes' brothers, dead; the Spartans refused to allow their dead king to be displayed as some trophy piece.
It was obvious the Greeks were superior soldiers man for man, but the tremendous numbers of their enemy soon began to wear them down: their spears broke from excessive use, and their swords began to dull. Before their final collapse, the Spartans and Thespians made their way to a little hillock within the wall, and there they made their last stand; the courage displayed by the Thebans vanished, and they surrendered to the Persians. They were given quarter, but all were branded with the king's mark as untrustworthy deserters.
The Greek historian Herodotus in his History recorded the final moments of the battle:
... the small desperate band stood side by side on the hill still fighting to the last, some with swords, others with daggers, others even with their hands and teeth, till not one living man remained amongst them when the sun went down. There was only a mound of slain, bristled with arrows ... those with weapons still clutching them.Twenty thousand Persians had died before that small number of men!
After the battle, Xerxes asked Demaratus if there were many more at Sparta like the 300. He was told there were 8,000 more like them. Xerxes was not enthralled with this answer, and ordered more reinforcements.
Leonidas' body was cut up and displayed to deter the Greeks from resisting, but the warning did not work. The Spartans would clash shields again with the Persians many more times, and Persian defeat would eventually come when a Spartan named Aristodemus, who was evacuated at Thermopylae with the allied forces (he was deathly ill, but called a "coward" nonetheless by his fellow Spartan citizens) fought in the name of Leonidas and crushed the Persians one last time and drove them ingloriously from Greece.
It is this Western spirit of determination that gave the 182 at the Alamo the courage to resist an overwhelming Mexican Army of 4,000, slaughtering 1,400 Mexicans before being taken. It is this battle hardness that allowed 105 British Soldiers to repel an attack of 4,000 Zulu warriors at Rorke's Drift, who after the battle were honored by the Zulus for resisting overwhelming odds. It is this innate legacy that gave the Totenkoph Division of the Waffen-SS -- bruised, battered, and battle fatigued -- the spirit which refused to surrender. They held their ground for 73 days against impossible odds in the Demyansk Pocket against a Red Army many times their number. And it is the same unwavering dedication that gave the 1st Marine Division in Korea the determination to duke it out with 10 Red Chinese divisions at Chosin; outmanned 10-1, they fought vigorously, finally making their way back to sea after breaking through an entrapment of insurmountable odds. Like those at the Alamo, Rorke's Drift, or the Waffen-SS at Demyansk, the United States Marine Corps stayed dedicated to their one commandment: Semper Fidelis! -- Always Faithful! .


Today, however, Western man's life is out of balance. The unwritten codes of honor, values thousands of years old, seem to be no more: the courageousness of his spirit has been siphoned to near extinction from his soul. On the modern battlefield, too many fail to speak up because they are afraid of the PC Hit Squad calling them "fascist," "racist," or "neo-Nazi." Of the great feats recorded in our history, our most disgraceful is not defeat by the hands of the enemy, but in modern times our servile acceptance of such words, which have become a wall that we must surmount to regain our cultural sanity. Such cowardliness was not a trait of our ancestors, and although many of us call ourselves descendants of these heroes, I will continue to doubt it until I see legions upon legions of Euros marching to defend the West.
Like those at Thermopylae, there remain a few who remain faithful to accomplishment; however, like the 300 Spartans, and the 700 Thespians who fought to the death, does the fight for the West die with them?

It is said that Intelligence is to take known facts, associate them, and arrive at an almost unrelated conclusion.

My reason for writing about the above is contained in the account of Leonidas, and the concluding statement of the narration.

In the Military, those in higher positions have made it so that the persons of principle to do not get promoted and are thereby ejected from the Military. Patton could not last nowadays, and General Grant would have never risen above Lieutenant.

It is the same in police work, and in corporate America. You have to be a Politician to get promoted. To this the Corporate/Military/Police "Managers" or " Administrators" ( They do not even hint that they are "Leaders") pressure those subordinate to them that," If you don't promote, you are not a success"

Politician= Do anything, say anything, to get where you want to go. Lie to most of the people to get their vote, then do what you want to do.

A good example was when I was an officer in San Diego County. On a street, on a Friday night, someone dumped two loads of gravel in front of this man's house. The man could not park his car in front of or get to his house. I was called, and dispatched to a "traffic hazard". It was determined that the man's neighbor was going to put in a swimming pool--starting Monday.

An "Acting Sergeant" came out. He told the man that the County would be out soon and remove the gravel. Before that, I had been told that County Road maintenance would NOT respond until Monday.

As we walked to our cars, I said to the "Acting Sergeant", " You just lied to him. Why?"

He said," It gets him off my back".

My point is that men/women of honor do not rise in rank. There are several reasons, and some exceptions.

The reasons. The main one. IF you promote a man who has honor, he will not lie for you if you cheat, lie, and screw up. Other reasons: A Man of honor knows he EARNED the promotion, and KNOWS he does not OWE his promotion to someone ab0ve him. A Superior can not "guilt" him into doing something out of bounds. A man of honor will protect his subordinates 100% if they have done nothing wrong. Superiors now days like to have a "Sacrificial Lamb" once in a while to throw to the "Race-baiters" and CAIR.

The exceptions: If Dad was a Big Shot--like John McCain, whose father was the Admiral commanding the Pacific Fleet when Inept John got shot down. If the person has an outstanding intellect and charisma, and superiors feel there would be a revolt if promotion was denied.

For a lot of people who value their honor above any human allegiance, the choice is simple: Stay at your present rank, go "By the Book", or sell your soul and get that promotion.

20 July 2006

The Myth of "Porportionate Response



A lot of the media are upset because Israel has bombed the Hell out of Hezbollah sites in Lebanon. The chant is:" Hezbollah just kidnapped a couple of IDF soldiers--what's the big deal? They could negotiate!"

Bullcrap!

Israel has almost negotiated away all of Israel. What has it got them? More suicide attacks, rocket attacks, and now, kidnappings.

To put your enemy down,whether it is a law enforcement situation or a military solution you are seeking, you have to do what a fellow officer decreed in the 70's.
The officer said," You have to knock his dick in the dirt".

If it is a life and death military scenario, you use whatever firepower at your disposal to NEUTRALIZE THE THREAT.

If it is a Peacekeeping confrontation, you have to do something similar to what I did to a nephew when he was rowdy, and we were trying to watch a soccer tournament. I asked him," Jim (not his name)--have you ever been unconscious?" He stares at me like--"Uncle is about to go out of control--uh-oh". He says, weakly," No". I ask him, " Would you like to go there?" End of noisy running, yelling!

Your opponent has to know that he is going to lose, and lose big time. Resistance will cost him more than he wants to pay.

19 July 2006

Don't get mad--get even



What I see as a trend is the "Don't get mad--get even" Theory.

When I began a career in law enforcement, your supervisor held life and death power over you. He could get you terminated. It was very rare that anyone talked back to a supervisor, and a charge of insubordination was something to worry about.

One Sergeant stands out in my mind. Merle Bush. Sgt. Bush had been a coxswain in the Coast Guard, and drove landing craft to the beaches in the Pacific during WWII.

If you displeased Sgt. Bush, he would instantly cuss you in a LOUD tone.
One officer did not fill in the space where the V I N number went on a Vehicle Storage Form Sgt. Bush asked him why he had not done that. The Officer snickered and said, "I didn't think it was important" Sgt. Bush threw a pencil at the officer's head.

Yes, every one in the office knew when Sgt. Bush chewed your ass. But, then it was over. If it came came to a fight, Sgt. Bush would be there for his officers, even one he just got done doing an ass chewing on.

Now, what you have are "The Nice Guys". They will watch and listen to your every move. If you are not a protected species, Minority, Female or Gay, every time you do something questionable, they will pull you in an office --just you and the supervisor--and question you. [Side note..There are just the two of you because the law prohibits you from taping a "Counselling Session" with a supervisor]
Usually, you will be called in a second time to sign a paper, detailing what you did "Wrong", and directing you to correct your operation.

Now the Nice Guys will tell you that they are there to "Help" you. They never raise their voice, have a permanent fixed smile, and act like you need sympathy. A Song they remind me of came out in the 60's, called "Smilin' Faces".

It is the conclusion of the ones who are targeted for this "direction" that there are two reasons the Nice Guy does this:
A. He/She is covering their own ass, so if you do something REALLY wrong in the future, he/she can say, "I told you so".
B. There is a term: "Bury you with paper". Which means that after about ten of these write-ups, usually containing ONLY opinion of the supervisor, who these days has minimal time "On the Road", and NO "street smarts", that supervisor can ask to start termination proceedings against you for "Incompetency" He/she will point to the "Letters of Direction" or "Incident Reports" that you signed as evidence that you can'tdo the job.

18 July 2006

Wrong-way freeway driver dies in collision




This headline could be one that is "Cut and Pasted" very often into news.
Source:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20060718-0632-bn18wrong.html

PHOTO:KEVIN SMITH...A California Highway Patrol officer examines the charred remnants of the wrong-way vehicle.

SAN DIEGO – A motorist driving the wrong way onto Interstate 5 in the downtown area early Tuesday morning slammed into a vehicle coming the other way and was killed, authorities said.
The driver who died was a woman who witnesses said had been driving a 2001 Dodge Dakota erratically on city streets around 12:48 a.m. before she entered the freeway from J Street in Sherman Heights, heading south in the northbound lanes.

A car coming the other direction in the fast lane, traveling around 65 mph, was unable to avoid colliding with the wrong-way driver. The pickup burst into flames, said California Highway Patrol Officer __________.

The other motorist was taken to the hospital with minor injuries, Officer _________ said.

THOUGHTS:
If you drive after 10:00PM, or before sunrise, STAY OUT OF THE FAST LANE. To a drunk, he/she is driving in the RIGHT lane. During my years in San Diego, we saw hundreds of these crashes, and about 95% are fatalities

Oh, and just try to solve this. One idea was to put a motion-activated tire ripper in place, so the drunk could not get on going the wrong way. "OH, NO. What if they were stalled in the ramp, and someone came off and hit them? We would be sued!"

"Officer______ said". This has been a trend seen since women became part of the force. Before, men worked twenty plus years, and then applied for jobs like this. That Officer had "paid his dues". Now, women with almost no time "on the road" ask for and get these jobs.
They wear a uniform.
They never get out of an office.
They get paid the same as an officer who risks his life and safety every day.
They hold their position as long as the Commander approves. Most Commanders are afraid to relieve a female from one of these clerical jobs.

14 July 2006

Wisdom from those that have seen the elephant




Things that are specially "on the Money" are in italics.
.

TIM DEES
Editor-in-Chief
Officer.com
http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=19&id=31561

Our discussion forum continues to be a source of inspiration for me (hey, you try to think of something that appears to be clever and informative every week!) for ideas for columns. Over the past couple of weeks, contributors there have posted their own pearls of wisdom, gained from long and sometimes painful experience. Here are some of them (a few of which I actually wrote myself):

Keep at least one clean uniform readily available at all times.

Nothing works as well as Lincoln Shoe Polish.

Wash your hands both before and after you go to the bathroom.

A pack of cigarettes, no matter how old, can be of great value in getting a reluctant witness or suspect to talk to you. Smokers, especially those under stress, will often do anything for a cigarette.

If you investigate a wreck when it's -20 degrees, use a pencil. The ink in your pen will freeze.

Carry at least two things you can write on -- in separate pockets.
When you get to the jail, put your car keys in the locker with your gun.


A ninety-eight cent flashlight from Wal-Mart is better than nothing if your fancy expensive rechargeable one goes dead.

If your supervisor ever says, "Trust me," you can't.

If the dog in the front yard doesn't appear to like cops, it's a good bet the people inside won't, either.


You should be able to drive an entire pursuit or prolonged emergency response, and never spill your coffee.

Always run cab drivers for warrants.

Your "war bag" should contain, among other things:
Wet wipes
A box of pens
Shoe laces
Aspirin, Tylenol, or something like it
A bottle of hand sanitizer
A roll of duct tape
A paperback novel that you haven't read yet
Regular and Phillips screwdrivers, a pair of pliers, and an adjustable wrench
A package of zip ties in various sizes
An energy bar or two
Spare batteries for everything you have that uses them
A supply of small sealable plastic bags
A jar of Vicks Vap-O-Rub® or its generic equivalent
Emergency cash, some of it in coins


Keep your backup gun where you can reach it with either hand.
Always carry a knife, preferably a non-folding one.
Admit nothing, deny everything, and demand proof. Consider making counter-accusations.
Keep a spare set of car keys in your pocket.
An occasional pizza delivered to the radio room for no particular reason will return its cost a hundredfold. A spare set of empty magazines for use at the range is an excellent investment.

Anyone that begins a sentence with "To tell the truth," won't.

Check to see if you are upwind before using the pepper spray.

Never make a threat that you are not prepared to carry out immediately. The only thing that works better than making threats is carrying them out.

Underage drinkers will have memorized all of the information on their phony ID card, but they won't be able to reproduce the signature without looking at it.

Polyester uniforms and road flares do not play nice together.

You will never go wrong in topping off your fuel tank before you start patrol.

Know what every convenience store clerk and gas station attendant on your beat looks like, and what they wear.

Education is nice. Experience is better.

Keeping a journal is a great idea. Telling someone that you're keeping a journal is a terrible idea.

At the outset of every stop, every confrontation, every call where you anticipate violence, pause for a microsecond to ask for strength, ferocity, accuracy, kindness, empathy, and wisdom.

When an announcement for an opening in a special assignment is issued, the desirability of the special assignment varies directly with the likelihood that someone already had it locked up long before the announcement was made.



Hug your significant other and kids every day, as if you will never get to do it again. When you can't remember a time when you thought your job was fun, it's time to leave.


Tim Dees is the editor-in-chief of Officer.com. Dees was a law enforcement officer for 15 years with the City of Reno, Nevada and later with the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Nevada, serving primarily as a uniformed patrol officer and sergeant

12 July 2006

Why Do Liberal Media Elites Despise Our Soldiers?



As a former Peace Officer, I figured this out a long time ago. But, I am nobody. My thoughts and words carry no great significance. As a Peace Officer, when going to court, often it was my word against the Defendant's. From 1974 on, I carried a tape recorder in my uniform shirt pocket to back up my version of what happened.

As to why do Liberals hate Police and Military:
This article by Rabbi Spero says it very accurately.
http://www.caucusforamerica.com/blog.php?pID=310


Every six months or so, the liberal media searches for any story that casts our soldiers in a bad light. Abu Ghraib was portrayed as indicative of almost the entire U.S. army when, in fact, it consisted of less than 1/1000 %. Besides which, in the scheme of possible war atrocities, it doesn't even rank. It was more uncouth behavior than atrocity.

As soon as a scenario is found where our soldiers defended themselves from enemy fire, road bombs or check-point crashing cars, the media indicts our boys, without first considering the circumstances which necessitated the shooting response. Guilty! Guilty until proven innocent.

It is quite obvious the media has a preconceived attitude toward our men and women in uniform and look for events to affirm their view. It is equally obvious that the media does not wait to issue its guilty judgement, even before the facts come in. For in the media's mind, the guilty outcome is a foregone conclusion given the liberal media's notion of who our soldiers really are. They want to believe the worst.


In the mind of most of today's smug liberals, our soldiers are rednecks -- and rednecks, when let loose and not under control of "civilized" liberals, do what comes natural to rednecks -- they act rednecky. Liberals feel that way since, in their parochial view, who would enlist and volunteer unless one is poor, has no chance for upward mobility, and has a tendecy and lust for violence?

They believe this since most have no friends or family in the military. These elitists perceive the soldier and the military as below their class. Perhaps they heard of a grandfather who served back in the days when there was a draft, but not today.

Why do they so despise our military? Why do they never come to its defense? Why do they never understand the frightful plight of the soldier who, when fired upon by the enemy, has no recourse but to fire back if he wishes to stay alive? Why does the liberal not understand what he has seen countless times, namely, that the Jihadist enemy positions women and children in his front while shooting at our soldiers?

It is because the liberal moralizer deep down knows that he does not have the physical courage and might of the soldier. Compared to the soldier, he is a coward and weakling. His strength lies only in bringing law suits and sounding morally superior to the rest of us.

The liberal moralizer needs to tear down the U.S. soldier as a way of guaranteeing that the soldier is never elevated to a more honored level in American life than is he, the liberal moralizer. Tear down the soldier and you destroy the honor we feel toward that soldier. Find anything to show you are better than the soldier so that you and your smug liberal friends can celebrate your superiority. Liberal media guys can not abide that America has heroes who are not them.

For the media, the heroes are Woodward and Bernstein or Washington Post and New York Times reporters who splash across the world U.S. national security secrets. They admire not those who defend but who tear down. Many entered the business for precisely that reason: to indict our institutions and ways.

By and large, certain very liberal cosmopolitan men are jealous of what the soldier can do, and have a desire, a need, to destroy the object of their envy.

By pressuring our government not to allow our soldiers engaged in urban battles to respond quickly, liberals -- especially the media -- are heightening the possibility that our young men will be killed. Their school yard "legalities" are handcuffing our soldiers and are, I'm convinced, precipitating American deaths and casualties. Our soldiers are now hesitating to defend themselves out of fear of being brought up on charges at the hands of the ACLU.

Our home-grown leftists must know how their 24/7 finger pointing and accusations are endangering the lives of our boys. Perhaps that is why they do it, not to mention a desire to humiliate our military and cause the defeat of the U.S. They have become accessories to and instruments for death.

If we in the West decide that our soldiers can never fire back at the enemy when women and children are present, then we have handed the enemy a sure-fire method for our defeat. We might as well roll up the streets of the West, now, since the enemy can move forward with immunity house-by-house, building-by-building, in every urban setting in which they choose to fight, including London and New York.


Thank God our safety is in the hands of these guys from the Midwest and South and not those snivelly effeminates from Brown, Brandeis, Columbia and N.Y.U. If it were so, we'd by now all be prayer rugs.

Rabbi Aryeh Spero

MOH for Brad Kasal


Hey Gang,
I received this from Michael Yon and feel it’s very important to pass on to you all. Please take the time to write your Congressmen about this and hopefully we can get this guy taken care of.
Semper Fi,
Taco

At the request of numerous readers and colleagues, Michael Yon has written a dispatch about Marine Sgt Major Brad Kasal and the questionable manner in which an iconic photograph of him taken by Lucien Read in Falluja in November 2004 was used in the recent Time magazine issue that focused on the controversy surrounding Haditha.

Here is an excerpt that will give a sense of the piece:

For many, Lucian Read’s photo of Brad Kasal – pistol at the ready even as he was being helped from the building, but still with presence of mind to keep his finger off the trigger despite that he had nearly bled to death – is emblematic of the heart and fighting spirit of every United States Marine. ...

Many service members believe Brad Kasal should be awarded the Medal of Honor. Any editor who would place the dazzle and drama of a layout above respect for the reputations of people of this caliber could use a few minutes of quiet circumspection. Brad Kasal is an incredible warrior and defender of our way of life who has demonstrated time and again that his life matters less to him than his duty to his country and to his fellow Marines.

Here is the link to the full article:

http://michaelyon-online.com/wp/warrior.htm

Please let me know if I can provide you or your readers with any additional information. In the meantime, I remain, respectfully yours

Rachel Barton

Commanding General, MCI West speech to the MAAC

HAT TIP...Laura Armstrong


[Below is the Commanding General, MCI West speech to the MAAC yesterday morning. For those that don't attend I thought it might be of interest]

Good morning ladies and gentlemen,
Eight days ago, I was present in the audience when Tom Brokaw addressed the 2006 Stanford graduating class. After the initial pleasantries and one-liners, Mr. Brokaw said something unexpected.
He told the class that they were the children of privilege, fortunate to be attending one of the finest educational institutions in the country, the anointed because they had both the test scores for admittance and parents who were able to afford their tuition. He noted that they could likely expect rapid advancement in almost any endeavor they choose and that they were destined to lead the most powerful country in the world.

The class was beaming.

And then Brokaw reminded them that the liberties and freedoms they enjoyed were being defended by young people their age that did not have their advantages. That at this time thousands of men and women were fighting, dying and suffering debilitating injury to ensure that the rest of us could live the American dream.

There was an uncomfortable shifting in the seats, followed by slow but growing applause from the audience.

When we sent my son to Stanford four years ago, we filled out a form asking for demographic information. One of the questions for the parents said, what is your profession? After it was a list of about thirty professions including doctor, lawyer, congressman, educator, architect. Military was not listed so I filled in "other"

My son was the only graduate who had a parent serving in the armed forces.

As I was introduced to his friends parents, it was interesting to watch their reaction. Few had ever spoken to a member of the military. One asked me how my son was able to gain admittance with the disadvantage of having to attend "those DoD schools". Many voiced support for our military and told me that they'd have served but clearly military service was not for their kind of people.

This year of the so-called elite schools, Princeton led them with nine graduates electing military service. Compare that with 1956 when over 400 of the Princeton graduating class entered the military. Most of the other Ivy League schools had no one entering the military this year.

I wonder how many of you know the young people who are serving today. I wont embarrass anyone by asking for a show of hands to ask how many really know a young enlisted Marine who has been to war.

I am going to try to give you a better feel about those who serve our nation.

Our Marines tend to come from working class families. For the most part, they came from homes where high school graduation was important but college was out of their reach. The homes they come from emphasize service. Patriotism isn't a word that makes them uncomfortable.

The global war on terrorism has been ongoing for nearly five years with Marines deployed in harms way for most of that time. It is a strange war because the sacrifices being levied upon our citizens are not evenly distributed throughout society. In fact, most Americans are only vaguely aware of what is going on.

That isn't the case aboard the Marine bases in Southern California where we see the sacrifice everyday as we train aboard those open spaces that you covet for other purposes.

Many of our Marines are married and 70% of our married Marines live in your communities, not aboard Marine bases. These Marines coach your soccer teams. They attend your places of worship. They send their kids to your schools. However, in many ways they are as different from the rest of the citizens of Southern California as my son was different from the rest of the students at Stanford.

One of the huge differences between the rest of society and our Marine families, is when Marine daddies and mommies go to work, some of them never come home. The kids know that. The spouses know that. Week after week we get reports of another son, father, husband who wont be coming back. During the past four years, over 460 Marines from Southern California bases have been killed by the enemy. 107 more have died in Iraq and Afghanistan due to accidents. 6500 have been wounded some of them multiple times.

You will never know or meet Brandan Webb age 20 or Christopher White age 23 or Ben Williams age 30. They were all assigned to First Battalion First Marine Regiment, Camp Pendleton, California. They were some of the Marines who died this week out of Marine bases in Southern California.

Last Friday, we hosted a golf tournament at Camp Pendleton to raise money for wounded Marines. There are a lot of expenses that the government cannot legally pay for from appropriated funds. The people who attended the tournament genuinely wanted to help and we invited a couple of dozen wounded Marines to golf with them. As I watched the teams leave for a shotgun start, I saw three Marines sitting by themselves and went over to talk to them. Clearly they'd been told by their chain of command that this was their appointed place of duty. They were sitting in the sun chatting, probably not unhappy with the duty but mildly uncertain as to why they were there.

I asked them why they wern't golfing and they said that they'd never learned. No one in their families ever played golf and that this was the first time they'd ever been on a golf course. I asked them how many times they'd deployed. One of the young men had just returned from his third deployment and had been wounded every time. The others teased him for being a bullet magnet. I asked him if he was going to stay in and he thought for a moment what to say to a general and he said, "I think Id like to try college. No one in my family has ever gone."

I asked these Marines if I could buy them a beer. They looked at me and smiled. One of them said, "We can't ask you to break the rules sir. None of us are 21 yet."

They seemed much older. As I left them I wondered about a policy that gives a young man the power of deciding who will live and who will die but wont let him drink a beer.

I thought about these young Americans who had never shot golf but had shot and killed other men in order to carry out foreign policy.

On the 10th of August we will open a wounded warrior barracks at Camp Pendleton. Few taxpayers dollars were used. We were able to raise the money through the Semper Fidelis fund to house those Marines who no longer need to be hospitalized but who suffer debilitating injuries and need follow-on care. Heretofore, when regiments left for the war, they left their non-deployables behind. These Marines often had to live in WWII era barracks with open squad bays and gang heads down the hallway. Those having limited mobility found it difficult and uncomfortable. It was no way to treat our wounded warriors. We're fixing it.

Mira Costa College. Though deployed soon after signing up for college, he took his textbooks to war. Last month he received Mira Costas highest award for academic excellence, the Medal of Honor for Academic Excellence.
Brendan described studying pre-calculus while fragments from explosions struck the sandbag shelter he was in. Brendan lef the Corps this week and has been accepted to the University of California Los Angeles to study math and economics.

Later this morning I'll be meeting with educators across the California University system. We are trying to make California more veteran friendly. California hosts 40% of the combat power of the Marine Corps and 40% of the Marine veterans who leave the Corps do so out of Southern California bases. 96% have participated in the Montgomery GI Bill and are eligible for benefits but only a small number enter the California University system.

That's because California, unlike other states did not provide any veterans preference or even reach out to veterans.
These combat veterans score in the top 50% of their age group, are drug free and morally straight but are lost to California and return to other states that aggressively work to attract them.

Several months ago, I along with senior leadership of all the Services, met with Governor Schwarzenegger and told him that California was not an education friendly state for military veterans. To his credit, he is trying to change that and this meeting today is a natural outgrowth of his support.

In Iraq, the media talks about the asualties. They seldom report the successes. I don't think that this is intentional. It is just more difficult to quantify progress and reduce it to a sound bite.

Some of you may recall almost exactly two years ago when a four man sniper team from 2nd Battalion, 4th Marines was killed on a rooftop in Ramadi. It made news because sniper teams aren't supposed to get ambushed and because an M40A1 sniper rifle was now in the hands of the enemy.

Over the next two years, that rifle was used against Americans and we wanted it back. Last week, a 21 year old Marine sniper from 3rd Battalion, Fifth Marines out of Camp Pendleton obseved a military aged male videotaping a passing patrol of amphibious assault vehicles near Camp Habbaniya. After radioing the patrol and telling them to stay low, the Marine watched the man aiming a sniper rifle that looked remarkably like his own.

He killed the enemy sniper with one round to the head. Seconds later, another insurgent entered on the passenger side and was surprised to see his partner dead. That hesitation was enough time to allow Sgt Kevin Homestead age 26 to kill the insurgent before he could drive off.

When the Marines went down to inspect the scene, they saw that the sniper rifle was one of their own. Itwas the same M-40A1 sniper rifle looted from the 2/4 sniper team exactly two years earlier.

We are making progress in Iraq. The Iraqi Army is more capable each month. In the Anbar province we have brought the 1st Iraqi Division - the most capable of the Iraqi formations - to the former British RAF base of Habbaniyah - between Fallujah and Ramadi. We are standing up the 7th Division. In Baghdad, Iraqi brigades own parts of the city and are reporting directly to the US Army Division commander as component units.
The Iraqi Police are the essential element - and the most difficult challenge. In an insurrection, the insurgent specifically targets the local security elements of the government - because they are essential to maintaining control via interaction with the community, intelligence gathering, and law enforcement against petty and organized crime, traffic control. These police units are having good success in places like Fallujah. Ramadi is a different kettle of fish. Some of the police departments haven't been paid in months and the intimidation campaign is in full force.
My Chief of Staff, Colonel Stu Navarre formerly the Commander of the 5th Marine Regiment told me this story. One day in December, the Ramadi Police Dept Operations Officer (#3 in the pecking order) did not come to work. When we inquired, he told us that the day before his 10 year old son had been kidnapped fter school and transported to the north side of Ramadi. He was called by the kidnappers and advised of his son's location. When the Operations Officer arrived at the location, he found his son alive, with a note pinned to his shirt, "If you go to work tomorrow, you will never see your son again. We know where you live." I wonder how many of us would show up for work with that kind of intimidation.

Your fellow Americans in uniform in Iraq and Afghanistan are doing a superb job in the most dangerous places on earth. They believe in what they are doing. The majority of the sergeants, corporals, and privates enlisted after 9-11.

They knew what they were signing u for. They want to deploy in defense of the nation. We are sending best leadership to the combat zone.
Service in Iraq/Afghanistan has become the norm for our Marine and Army leaders, and an essential part of their experience/qualifications for advancement.

Finally, the American people have continued to demonstrate an unprecedented level of support for their fellow Americans in uniform - as well as the understanding tha t these young men and women are executing the policies of their elected representatives.
Reconstructing an entire nation takes time. Think about our own experience during the American Revolution. Despite having a homogeneous nation with no incipient insurgency, it was thirteen years from the Revolution to the ratification of the Constitution. We seem to have forgotten that it takes time to build institutions.
Introductio of a stable, representative form of government in Iraq is revolutionary in its impacts on the region and the world. Iraq is at the center of the Mid-East, the Arab world, and Shia Islam. Iraq has been, and will continue to be a major producer of natural resources - especially oil. It is at the center of the chess board. Iraq separates two sponsors of terrorism - Iran and Syria - and with Afghan istan - isolates Iran. It is no coincidence that Muammar Qadaffi has sensed the change in the wind and sought to distance himself from terrorism and WMD and become a legitimate player in world politics.

The Iraqis are capable of running Iraq.

Today, thousands of young Iraqis are lining up to become soldiers and policemen - despite constant, highly lethal attacks on recruiting stations, police stations, and army checkpoints. Concurrently, there is no more dangerous job than being a candidate for offic or an elected official in Iraq. We should not underestimate the absolute danger to any Iraqi that steps up to plate for law, order, and progress. The enemy is absolutely committed to winning. For him, there is really no other option. He also understands that the center of gravity is the commitment of the American people.

One of my major concerns is quality of life issues for our Marines, Sailors and their families. We are making significant progress but we have a long way to go. We are building 1600 more homes at Miramar to give our Marines and Sailors decent places to live. California is a beautiful State. It is also extraordinarily expensive and we are the gypsies in your castle often driving 50 or 60 miles one way to because those are the only places that our junior Marines can afford to live.

We are replacing worn out World War II vintage barracks that we make our single Marines live in. When I took over, I visited some of the open squad bay barracks at Camp Horno in Pendleton. A young Marine corporal and veteran of the fighting in Iraq looked at me and said, "Sir, I lived better in Fallujah." That hurt but he was right. A couple of weeks later I had a chance to talk to the Commandant and tell him the same story. I told him that at the rate we were replacing barracks, we wouldn't have decent enlisted quarters until 2036. To his credit, he listened and we now plan to have them replaced by 2013.

This won't come without a cost because the Marine Corps doesn't get more money to build barracks, we have to realign our priorities and not buy other things that we need. It was a significant decision by our senior leadership but the right thing to do.

With our Navy partners we are going after Pay Day Lenders. Pay Day Lenders are the parasites found outside of our military bases in Southern California who pray on young Marines and Sailors because the lenders know they are uninformed consumers. Pay day lenders take avantage that California has some of the weakest laws in the country. In North Carolina, pay day lenders are limited to 36% annual percentage rates of interest. Here in San Diego we regularly see rates of 460% and I have seen rates as high as 920% being charged legally against our service members. Service members go into a cycle of debt. Ultimately because we ex pect our Marines to be financially responsible, their ability to reenlist, compete for good jobs and keep a security clearance is effected.

Let me be clear. Pay day lenders are not providing our Marines wit a service. They are parasites, bottom feeders and scumbags. One of them sent me a note recently telling me that he was a member of an honorable profession and that I should back off. He told me that a pay day lending institution had been found in the ruins of Pompey after Mount Vesuvius erupted. I responded to him that archeologists also found a whore house and that antiquity did not bequeath virtue. It is a shameful practice.

We also recognize that military leaders have a responsibility to educate our service members and their families about sound money management. We are doing that. We are using our base papers, information campaigns and personal intervention to tell them that there are alternatives to the pay day lending institutions.

Both the State and Federal legislatures have heard our message as well and there are bills making their way through the process to significantly curtail the excesses of payday lenders.

I know that many of you came here today to find out what I would say about the airport situation at Miramar.

So as not to disappoint you, let me be clear.

The Marines came to Miramar ten years ago as a result of a BRAC decision and four subsequent BRAC rounds determined that the interrelationship of the Marine and Navy bases in Southern California provided a capability that was unmatched anywhere in the country.

The Marine Corps uses its bases as a projection platform for combat power. 25,000 Marines from California bases are presently deployed in harms way and over 3,000 of them are from Miramar.

Through the years, we have accommodated our neighbors development needs. Often we allowed infrastructure that was unpopular elsewhere but vital to the community. San Diego's primary landfill is located at Miramar. A nuclear generation facility sits aboard Marine Corps property at Camp Pendleton and powers 2.2 million Southern California homes. We want to be good neighbors and work hard at it.

We examined the proposal for joint use of Miramar carefully, provided all data requested and saw that data ignored. Joint use does not work at Miramar. Thus the real issue is whether you want a civilian airport at Miramar or Marines.

If you want us to leave, you should say so. However you must understand that no matter what names are used to describe us in the Union Tribune, the decision whether or not to leave does not rest with the military leadership in Southern California. It rests with your elected leaders and most of them have clearly put defense needs above local requirements and said no to Miramar. The decision rests with the appointed civilian leadership in the department of defense. They've said no as well.

Sadly this controversy has effected local civil military relations. There is no way you can sugar coat it or pretend otherwise. But we are here. If our leadership tells us to leave we will. We will take our Marines, our families, our wounded and if necessary we will dig up our dead. However right now our leadership says we stay. And whether or not we remain in San Diego, the Marine Corps is committed to protecting your liberties and your freedoms.

We know that this is a difficult issue. We know that we have many friends in San Diego but we also know that we have others who see the economic potential of development of the military installations. They say that they love the military but would rather love them somewhere else than in their backyard.

If you take nothing away from this talk, I'd hope you understand and appreciate what a remarkable group of young people currently serve in your Armed Forces today. Want to know what Marine Generals talk about when we are together? We talk about what a remarkable privilege it is to lead these extraordinary Americans.

I started by mentioning Tom Brokaw. His book coined the phrase, The Greatest Generation" and our nation responded in kind. Twenty years from now we may recognize that this young generation currently serving has the same qualities of greatness.
On the battlefield today are future CEOs of corporations, university presidents, congressmen, state governors, Supreme Court justices and perhaps a future president of the United States.
Take the time to meet one of these young people. You wont be disappointed.
OK, I've talked long enough. I'd be happy to take your questions.


General Lehnert is the CG of Marine Corps Installations West

Leads in Mumbai blasts case: Govt sources-Why we fight



HAT TIP to Sid Fredrickson
Wednesday, July 12, 2006: (Mumbai)
http://www.ndtv.com/breakingnews/default.asp?refno=712200683944AM#

or

http://tinyurl.com/ovee6

Sources in the Union Home Ministry have confirmed to NDTV that the Lashkar-e-Toiba is the main suspect behind Tuesday's serial blasts in Mumbai.

In particular, agencies believe that about 20 terrorists might have carried out Tuesday's attack and were locally recruited sleeper cells, possibly controlled by one person.

Each of the bombs was similar. In fact, intelligence sources are looking at the possibility of the Mumbai blasts being a part of the same operation, which carried out the attack at Bangalore's Indian Institute of Science and Varanasi.

Terror modules

The magnitude of the sychronised blasts has conclusively pointed to the use of RDX by the attackers.

Two months ago, 30 kg of RDX was recovered, so perhaps some might have slipped past the security forces.

The bombs in Mumbai were set off using timer devices, considering all the seven blasts took place within a span of 11 minutes. At least 183 people were killed and 714 injured in a series of blasts in the city.

Several modules of LeT and Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) have been busted and huge amount of explosive materials, including RDX, recovered during raids at various places in Aurangabad, Nasik and Nagpur in the last two months.

In the largest haul of RDX in Maharashtra in over a decade, 30 kg of the deadly explosive concealed in computer CPUs was recovered, along with 10 AK-47 rifles, and a large cache of ammunition.

The RDX was recovered after an hour-and-a-half-long chase through the hilly jungles of Aurangabad.

The Anti-Terrorist Squad finally caught up with the Sumo of the suspected terrorists near Ellora.

"My heartiest congratulations to the Maharashtra police and the Anti-Terrorist squad. In the last one-year, they have been successful four times in seizing RDX," said R R Patil, Deputy Chief Minister, Maharashtra.

Three of the accused Amir Shakil Ahmad (30), Zubair Syyed Anwar (26) and Muzaffar Mohammad Tanvir (24), all of them from Juna Bazaar area of Aurangabad, were produced in a Mumbai court.

Later in the day Muzaib Patel, the owner of the Sumo, surrendered to the Aurangabad police.

Kingpin of operation

The police suspect a jihad angle as the carriers did not receive any money to transport the arms. The chief of this network appears to be a man called Chima who is currently located in Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir.

Investigations reveal that two of their associates Abdul Azim and the kingpin of this operation Zabi Ansari were in an Indica that escaped during the chase.

Police suspect they might have been carrying more arms and explosives.

The Indica was found abandoned on the Nashik-Shirdi Highway but nothing was found in it.

Within hours an investigation team ran into a heap of abandoned arms and explosives- 50 hand grenades, one AK 47 rifle and magazines at the base of a hill in the Ankaye Killa area of Malegaon, 100 km from Aurangabad.

Five people are arrested on charges of forging the Indica licence plate.

They were produced in court the next morning and remanded to police custody.

But again in the night there was some more discovery.

ATS found 12 kg of RDX, five AK-47s and 1000 rounds of bullets from an electric shop in Malegaon. The owner, Abdullah was taken into custody.

After a day of lull came yet another arrest. Bilal Abdul Razzak Ansari, an Urdu translator was arrested from Aurangabad.

Ten people have been arrested in this case so far. The police are now hunting for mastermind Zabi Ansari and his associate who disappeared during the chase on Wednesday.

Planned attacks

Seven blasts rocked Mumbai on Tuesday within minutes of each other with the first one at Khar-Santa Cruz at 6:24 pm (IST).

The second blast was reported at Jogeshwari station at 6:25 pm (IST) while the third blast took place at Borivali at 6:26 pm (IST).

Soon after, the fourth explosion took place at Mahim at 6:28 pm (IST) while the fifth blast was reported at Mira Road at 6:31 pm (IST).

While the sixth blast was reported from Bandra at 6:33 pm (IST), the seventh explosion occurred at the Matunga station at 6:34 pm (IST).

The blasts were targeted at commuters in the suburbs and took place in the first class coaches during rush hour.

The Home Ministry has said that the terror attacks were planned. High intensity explosives were used in the attack.

The IB is probing the link between the blasts at Srinagar and Mumbai, and also looking at possible link with PoK polls.

However, Home Secretary VK Duggal has said that there is no link between the blasts in the two cities.

Worst attack

It's the worst attack since the 1993 attacks. The blasts are reminiscent of the 2004 Madrid and 2005 London attacks, in all of which, commuter trains were hit.

Here's a chronology of the recent attacks on the city of Mumbai:

March 12, 1993: A series of bomb blasts ripped through 13 places in the city, killing 257 people and injuring 713. These were the first blasts in which RDX was used and the explosions were allegedly planned by underworld don Dawood Ibrahim.

December 2, 2002: Two persons were killed and 31 injured when a powerful bomb exploded in a municipal bus outside Ghatkopar suburban railway station.

December 6, 2002: Twenty-five people were injured when a bomb exploded in a food plaza at Bombay Central railway station. The bomb was planted in an air-conditioning duct.

January 27, 2003: Thirty people were injured when a crude bomb planted in a bicycle exploded at a shopping complex outside Vile Parle railway station.

March 13, 2003: Eleven people were killed and 65 injured when a powerful bomb exploded in a 'ladies special' train when it was entering Mulund railway station in the peak hours.

August 25, 2003: Two blasts occurred one after the other at the Gateway of India and Zaveri Bazaar, killing 46 people and injuring more than 160. RDX was planted in taxis parked at both these places.


WHEN DID IT START FOR US, HERE IN THE UNITED STATES?

1. Many will say September 11, 2001. The answer as far as the United State
is concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the
following attacks on us:

* Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;
* Beirut, Lebanon Embassy 1983;
* Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
* Lockerbie, Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;
* First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;
* Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;
* Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy 1998;
* Dares Salaam, Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
* Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000;
* New York World Trade Center 2001;
* Pentagon 2001.

(Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist
attacks worldwide
).

SO, While JOHN KERRY, JACK MURTHA, AND the Demo-Rad Party tells us we should RETREAT", RE-DEPLOY", or as most of us with a lick of common sense say "CUT-AND-RUN"
Be afraid...be very afraid.

11 July 2006

Political Intimidation


[Click on images to enlarge]
KABC Radio - Ken Minyard Show - August 26, 2003.
Caller Steve (regarding Special Order 40): "The rest of your arguments are humorous. They're here illegally his job is to uphold the law."
Chief Bratton: "In as much as California has pretty much indicated that they don't want us involved in that issue, we're out of that business. If you don't like it leave the state."















This article appeared in today's Washington Times:
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060710-115221-4749r.htm
Senate bill may restrict police
By Charles Hurt
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
July 11, 2006


State and local police would be prohibited in key ways from helping Immigration and Customs Enforcement combat illegal immigration under Senate legislation, a wall that opponents say would lead to rampant fraud, hamper efforts to deport future illegals and threaten national security.
"The Senate bill would actually make us less safe," said Rep. Ed Royce, California Republican and chairman of the International Relations Committee's subcommittee on international terrorism and nonproliferation. It "would roll back the ability for state and local officials to cooperate with federal officials."
Out of deference to the confidentiality concerns of foreigners in the U.S., the bill would bar state and local police from detaining aliens simply for being in the U.S. illegally. Police could arrest the aliens only if they commit certain additional violations of federal immigration law such as marriage fraud or document counterfeiting.






This has gone on for about 45 years. Los Angeles put in RULE 40. RULE 40 dictated to Police that they could NOT ask if someone was a citizen, as that MIGHT deter the person from reporting a crime.

In San Diego, a Hispanic Deputy Chief of Police dictated that "Lowriders" would not be stopped, and not be cited, even though their vehicles were illegal and unsafe because " It is an ETHNIC violation"

10 July 2006

MORE LYING, by those who are paid for truth

Everyone entrusted with U.S. government classified information is legally bound to protect it. They may not reveal the data to anyone not authorized to receive it. Collectively our national security depends on that trust. There are no exceptions. Or are there? What about individuals who seek out media surrogates to reveal classified information for them? In return these individuals demand protection from exposure and legal action. How can they be protected from exposure and legal action for such serious offenses? By the media erecting a solid, impregnable First Amendment stonewall.
There it is. If you want to reveal information critical to our national security for any reason, turn it over to a reporter. Once the information is in the hands of a reporter, the reporter and his or her news media claim the authority to decide its relevance to our national security and who should know.
On Dec. 15, 2005, New York Times reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau revealed that government sources had handed them classified information on how the National Security Agency uses the Echelon eavesdropping system in our war with terrorists. As requested by their sources, the New York Times then revealed this critical information to the world. Terrorists worldwide now know the details of a critical tool in our war against them. It's a fact. There will now be far fewer "dots" for our intelligence community to identify and connect.
It's a no-brainer how the terrorists, our sworn enemies, reacted.
The New York Times explained why they are protecting their sources: The sources "were granted anonymity because of the classified nature of the program." The New York Times then explained why these sources had violated the trust our nation had placed in them: "because of their concerns about the operation's legality and oversight." On June 23 of this year, New York Times reporters Risen and Lichtblau told the world that the CIA and the Treasury Department were using bank transactions obtained from a Belgian cooperative to track suspected al Qaeda members. Yes, the New York Times permanently erased even more "dots."
Can you hear terrorists cheering? Should government sources that reveal classified information to reporters feel secure hiding behind media-erected stonewalls? Consider the case of Dr. Wen Ho Lee, the atomic scientist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. He had been suspected of disclosing classified information to China.
During the media frenzy surrounding Dr. Lee, New York Times reporter Risen again reported information obtained from government sources. He wasn't alone. Along with the Times, reporters from The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, ABC News and the Associated Press all used information received from government sources during their hard-hitting media frenzy. Trouble is, Dr. Lee hadn't revealed any classified information. Dr. Lee sued the Energy and Justice departments, claiming they had violated his rights by revealing he was under investigation for being a spy.
During the federal trial, the reporters were ordered to reveal the government sources of their stories. The reporters refused. The federal judge held the reporters in contempt of court. The reporters faced fines and jail time. Their sources faced exposure.
The media organizations pleaded in federal court that the First Amendment protected the right of their reporters to refuse to identify their government sources. The media lost. The media appealed. Every appeal denied the existence of such First Amendment protection.
The media organizations were left with one last appeal -- to the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court had previously ruled that the First Amendment offered no such protection. If the media went to the Supreme Court and lost, their crumbling First Amendment stonewall would totally collapse. Their sources would be exposed in a public court, and the media would then be required to report the names of their sources to the world.
The legal staff of five media organizations jointly agreed that their only alternative was to buy their way out of their legal morass. They paid Dr. Lee $750,000 in order to void the contempt sanctions the judge had issued against the reporters.
In this case, the resources of media giants protected their reporters. Their reporters would not have to pay hefty fines or serve jail time.
But what about the media's anonymous sources that revealed the NSA's Echelon eavesdropping and the bank transactions used to track suspected al Qaeda members? Will the media giants commit all of their resources to protect and defend each and every one? Or will the media's anonymous sources be next to pay a price for erasing "dots"?

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060709-081513-6919r.htm
Jack O'Neill
Jack O'Neill worked in the White House under President Carter as a telecommunications policy analyst.

It gets me that members of Police Agencies and the Military HAVE NO FREE SPEECH RIGHTS, and can not disclose "internal information" regarding equipment, policies, or their personal opinions of their superiors. This is why I can now express myself--I'm retired.

That is one aspect.

Another is that those who do reveal or disclose are sanctioned, disciplined, or terminated.

Yet, the Democratic Party and Liberals in general have this "Situational Justification" for revealing information that can get U S Servicemen, and in cases, U S citizens killed.

The Propaganda Arm of the Liberals and democrats is the Main Stream Media. The Alphabet networks, in league with Al-Jazeera, are making sure that Islamo-fascists hold on to their violent religion of death as long as they can, and kill as many soldiers as they can.

Simultaneously, they say the Constitution protects those who engage in TREASON, i.e., revealing information that will kill Americans.

The Print version champ is the New York Times. As illustrated in Mr. Oneill's column above. They are as corrupt as any official in a Third World Country.

">